is it like assets
Weapons to where, for what Price ??
It is not my job to commenht on your wars !
I get the feeling that they wanztt o involve me in their wars. But I am not interested i va no time tzo comment oin your stupoid wars.
Theother thing that soimetimes it can be the feeling that there is th eneed to warnm somebody. If it is a german cancellor duirng heavy decision making and he was not there in Gemany then. What will, tehy thinkj in the future if the main decision makers or what they could expect from a cancellor of a bigger european country. Everywhere onteh ews and medias you get nbio involved into Ukraine. And tehy tell you that it culd become along war.
How long did it take them to get out of Afganisthan and how long dod they like to stay there, kill involeve and meddle there. It was another stupid senseless war, same counts for Syria. So another war is just getting a big story becaus it gets done and even supported close to Europe.
Are the volks of Europe som enthusiastic foir that war, do they like to get sent there in Ukraine and fight there. I do not think so.
It seems that many EU lands want to support the one side, even as both and many nations got smart in the northern hemispheres since years, or it is that waht they tried to get over some maps, over and by some smart phones. It gets lands and countries involved of which people of the wolrd could say that these lands got some smart tag, and ...
now they are on the way, on another bunring path to loose that smart tag, a brand so to say. They really lkike to engage in another side of a medal which could start to melt in their hands then lately.
Im am very surprised to get to know that some small european lands want to send weapons, as like to free some assets, like to get involved into the media hypes and mashineries of the wagon to the ukrainean border. Is is lands like Belgium, lands like G.Britain and Germany, but some smaller lands then even, which a few can not easily find, even not on their own smartphones. Is it also Holland which wants to enegage strongly in that burning conflict and bad scenario. I can hardly believe it.
It is surpisiring and very disturbing that some small lands in Europe like to engage (their leaders) and maybe even later want to burn their fingers if not even their total limbs and arms by taking a site and strong stand in that conflict.
Do they have any idea about the price for their stupid engagement, by their stupid decisions to send them weapons and even the more heavy weapons.
It seems that quite a few decision makers in Europe have no idea about the dangerouse path, teh decision for a very dangerouse path.
Street traffic is daily heavy, risky for many without knowing it. It would be better if people of european lands could decide if they want to support that conflict with heavy weapons. Finally it is tehir money and their taxes which gets used for that weapons, even as most companies are all now in private hands and run by private bunch of investors and so on.
The decison makers of a european marcet should be carefull to decide over the heads of their volks on weapon delivery into a hot and burning conflict and that with asuperpower on teh others side. Do they know the burning path, do they know
The last rockets on Kiev indicate that Mr Gutterres and Mr Putin had not the best of talks in their lifetime. It hints in the way that the Kremlin
is and was not satisfied with soem countries getting involved with sanctions, getting involved with weapons and heavy weapon deliveries, it hints in the way that the Kremlin does not like the sanction regiumes of some smart nations nd lands and that they have not the least idea about what might come and follow.
It seems that many of them have some ideas on sanctions and weapon deliveries, but not the numbers on gas and petrol, not the idea on dependencies and the cost therefor. Some say taht conflivćt could take years but do they know why it coudl take that long. Do tehy know how lands look after years of engegement of some smart lands far away. Riussia ius a superpower and that also copunted on energy delivery.
In return heavy weapons after two month and teh 6th sanction packaage, is like big moves on a chess game, but 1000 times mor edangerouse.
So teh small lands shoudl know what tehy send to Ukraine tehy better should think twice and three times, if it is weapons or hospital equipment, if it is helmets or medicines, if it is guns with a tag, or if it is equipment for building wood bridges and ponton ones over some streams which had big bridges before. The many lands in europe shpould know very well what they deliver to Ukraine.
Amazon has up tp 70 % retouren, how profits can get doen so is amistery to me. And what they get in return from Ukraine coudl in response also look very different.
Russia might get to know very soon who of these lands gets involved in Ukraine and with what equipment, stuff or advisers.
With amazon many have an idea on the orice tags, with Ukraiine they d better think twice.
They spoke of "ring supply" to get these, their weapons through, somehow camouflaged over there corners, but what makes the difference then there when that weapons get into use and force.
Is it the form of share they want to get with Ukraine, is that the form of message and postings, some odd stuff delivered by a third party, a 5th party and over a comploiceted three statecorner area to get that through somehow semi unlawfull and hidden, unknown ? They d better know how and what they send them and for what price !!
Russia will find out very soon who all is getting involved from some neoliberal western smart side, they were always good in that as well.
They were also good in showing them some lackings with hacking their systems over different times (voting etc). I woudl not like to see soem mideuropean land with teh Alps sending weapons to Ukraine. There is much other way and stuff which can be of help in many forms but weapns are usually the stuff which the higest cost and price in reward.
Did the small countries of Europe send weapons to Syria, to Lybia as well so fast, did they decide to send heavy weapons to Yemen and Afgansithan,
and now the more do they knwo with whom they get involved then.
Volks get the bugs and senses clear, get the rubbish out of the news, radio and TV. Before that EU parlamentarians decide on weapons to Ukraine there is many other stuff and issues to make good decisons about.
If some of their odd rulers in small european lands want to engage in Ukraine ask before why they did not send weapons from their lands to Afganisthan and Iraq, why they did not use that special way of delivery for wapons to Yemen (the house of Al Saud is also a heavy world player) ask that smart EU parlamentarians why they did not send that desastrouse things to Lybia before, why they did not send their weapons to Syria.
So when it gets now to Ukraine and Russia they should better know what and why they want to send it to them now at a sudden.
Then get the answers right, and then volks just imagine and think twice and know the price for sending weapons.
If it was not with Syria, Iraq and Afganisthan why at a sudden they wnat to do that now with Russia and Ukraine.
It does not look to be that heavy, really for them